Contents
Acknowledgements
List of Tables
Executive Summary
Part one: Introduction and context of the research
Introduction
Research aims and objectives
Recent research on rural racism
Community profile of the Norton Radstock area
Black and other minority ethnic population
Data on reported racist incidents
Summary and conclusions
Part Two: Research design
Introduction
The management of the research
Fulfilling the research objectives
Using local researchers
Accessing Black and OME interviewees
Sample achieved
Carrying out the interviews
Analysing the results
Problems, constraints and opportunities arising
Research assistants: experience of the project
Summary and conclusions
Part Three: Research findings: service providers
Introduction and overview
Race equality schemes, statements and policies
Perceptions of the Norton Radstock area
The size of the black and OME population
Awareness of the needs and experiences of the local black and OME
community
• Racism in rural areas
• Complacent attitudes
• The use of services by black and OME people
Needs identified
• Discrimination
• Health needs
• Language issues
• Dual heritage identity
• Cultural sensitivity in service provision
Lack of awareness of needs
• Absence of systematic ethnic monitoring
• Lack of outreach work
• A ‘colour blind’ approach
Examples of good practice
Racist incidents and racial harassment
• Confusion over ‘racist incidents’
Staffing
• Staff awareness levels and training needs
Longer term ideas
Summary and conclusions
Part Four: Interviewees experiences of the Norton Radstock
area
Introduction and overview
The sample (gender, age, ethnicity)
• Place of residence
• Length of residence
• Reasons for moving to the area
• Extended family in the area
Experiences of living in the Norton Radstock area
• Positive experiences
• Isolation
• ‘Fitting in’
• Standing out and being stared at
• Racist remarks and assumptions
• Impact upon identity
Experiences of hostility
Racism within schools
• Racist incidents
• Name-calling
• Treatment of black and OME children
• The school curriculum and ethos
• Cultural differences and needs
• Positive experiences
Racism at home
• Racism in the family
• Racism in the neighbourhood
• Coping strategies
• Police involvement
Racism at work
• Racism from service users/customers
• Racism from employers and colleagues
• Not being valued
Politics
Racism during leisure time
• In local pubs
• Outings with children
• Shopping
• Public transport
Difficulties in using voluntary and statutory sector
services
What would make Norton Radstock a better place to live?
• Changing attitudes
• More Black and OME people
• The role of schools
• Community resources
Summary and conclusions
Part Five: Conclusions and recommendations
Introduction and overview
Experiences of isolation and racism
Problems and barriers in accessing local services
Recommendations
Appendices
References
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the two research assistants, Pippa Walkes
and Lisa Wall for the substantial contribution they have made to
this research project. They have both provided invaluable
assistance by helping to shape the researchand making links within
the community. Their perseverance and commitment to the issues has
encouraged local people to engage with the project. It has been a
pleasure to work with two such dedicated and thoughtful people.
Thanks to all the staff from voluntary and statutory sector
organisations whotook part in the research. I appreciate the time
people have given to take part,and I look forward to hearing their
views and comments on the researchfindings and recommendations when
they are circulated. Thanks also to those of you who helped access
potential interviewees through your networks.
I am grateful to staff at B&NES REC for their support and
guidance. Ruksana Ghoas helped to get the research project started
before she left her post as Director, and since then Beryl Dixon
and Jason Pegg have been supportiveand encouraging in their
management of the project. Thanks also to Julie Brown, Glyn Roberts
and the rest of the team at B&NES Racial Equality Council for
their administrative support and for making me feel so welcome on
my visits to the REC offices. Also, special thanks to Glyn for his
help with the charts and tables.
The PRIDE (Partnership for Racial Identity of Diverse
Ethnicities) steering group members have made an important
contribution to the project direction. Carl Saunders was
instrumental in securing funding so that this piece of work could
go ahead. I would also like to thank Mel Clinton (B&NES Local
Partnerships Manager) along with Annette Ford, for being focused on
the future so that there will hopefully be mechanisms in place to
take this work forward.
Rashad Azami, Imam at the Bath Islamic Centre, gave me some
useful contacts in the Norton Radstock area, and Shobha Das at SARI
agreed to pass on information about the project, which helped
access participants. hanks to you both.
Finally, I would like to thank the 35 people who took part in
the research, and talked so openly about what were often difficult
and painful experiences to recount. Your collective experiences and
views form the backbone of this report: the strength and level of
difficulties you have expressed will mean that racism in Norton
Radstock is no longer hidden. I hope your contributions will act as
a lever for change in the future.
List of Tables
Table 1: Gender Breakdown of the Sample
Table 2: Age Breakdown of the Sample
Table 3: Ethnic Breakdown of the Sample
Table 4: Places of Residence within the Norton Radstock
Area
Table 5: Length of Residence in the Area
Table 6: Levels of Hostility
Next
page
Page 1 of 7